谦虚谨慎或者骄傲自负:中国本土管理研究的心态问题  

Modesty or Overconfidence:On the Attitude for Conducting Chinese Indigenous Management Research

作　　者：李鑫 

机构地区：[1]丹麦哥本哈根商学院

出　　处：《管理学报》2016年第1期40-48,共9页Chinese Journal of Management

摘　　要：关于中国本土管理研究的心态问题,阐述3个观点:中西方主流的思维方式不是替代或从属的而是互补的关系,因此无所谓孰优孰劣;易经阴阳等辩证思想并非中国独有,赫拉克利特和黑格尔也有类似思想,黑格尔辩证法的扬弃过程在结构上与阴阳变易几乎毫无二致,都是四元结构而非"正-反-合"三元结构;西方思想界从古至今一直存在着两个思维传统,即作为主流的逻辑传统和作为支流的辩证传统,而在中国思想的发展史上,虽然逻辑思维也曾昙花一现,但基本上只有辩证思维这一个传统。由此,那种认为中国传统哲学因其所具备的辩证性足可使中国本土管理研究后来居上的论调是不切实际也不合时宜的。用初具雏形的管理悖论的哥本哈根诠释为例反证了以上观点。Regarding the attitude for conducting Chinese indigenous management research,this paper makes three arguments.First,the relationship between the mainstream patterns of thinking of China and the West is not substitutive or subordinative,but a complementary one,and therefore it is meaningless to say which is superior to the other.Second,dialectical thinking such as Yi and YinYang is not unique to China,Heraclitus and Hegel also had similar ideas.The structure of Hegel＇s dialectical sublation/becoming is almost same as that of the change process of Yin-Yang,being quadruplicity rather than triplicity of so called thesis-antithesis-synthesis.Third,in the history of Western thinking,there are two parallel traditions,one being the logical major stream and the other dialectical minor stream;while in China,there has always been only a dialectical one although the logical thinking appeared briefly once in pre-Qin period.Therefore,it is unrealistic and inappropriate to assert that the dialectical nature of Chinese traditional philosophy will enable Chinese indigenous management research to catch up with or even overtake the Western management research.The author supports the above arguments with emergent Copenhagen Interpretation of management paradox.

关 键 词：阴阳 辩证 玻尔 哲学 哥本哈根 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]