劳动力流动与收入差距演变:基于我国城市的理论与实证  

Evolution of labor flow and income gap: Theories and empirical test on Chinese cities

作　　者：邵宜航[1,2] 汪宇娟 刘雅南[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学宏观经济研究中心,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学经济学院,福建厦门361005 [3]福州大学经济与管理学院,福建福州350116

出　　处：《经济学家》2016年第1期33-41,共9页Economist

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"我国二元经济背景下的增长与发展研究"(71273216);教育部人文社科项目"包容性增长视角下的中国式城市化"(11YJA790125);教育部重点基地项目"集聚;结构转变与经济增长"(14JJD790026)

摘　　要：劳动力流动对城市内部收入差距的影响可分为结构效应和总量效应。结构效应考察劳动力流动人口的结构性差异对不同阶层工资收入的差异性影响。总量效应则考虑劳动力流入导致的住房需求总量增加可能产生的相应阶层的财产性收入的变化。本文的理论分析与基于我国城市数据的计量检验表明:由于流动劳动力的整体受教育水平较低,目前我国劳动力流动仍然会扩大城市内部收入差距;而当流动劳动力中接受高等教育的比例超过一半时,劳动力流动则可能缩小城市内部收入差距。The influence of labor flow on the income gap inside a city refers to structural effects and gross effects. Structural effects examine the impacts of structural difference in the population of labor flow on the difference in wages of various classes. Gross effects should consider the changes in property income led by the increase in the demand of housing due to labor inflow. The theoretical analysis and measurement test suggest that： labor flow in China would still expand income gap inside cities at present due to low educational level of the labor force; and when more than half of the labor force have received higher education, such labor flow could decrease income gap inside city.

关 键 词：劳动力流动 收入差距 总量效应 结构效应 

分 类 号：F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学]