生态整体主义的三重困境——论中国当代生态美学哲学基础的局限  

On the Treble Predicament of Ecological Holism:the Limitations of Philosophical Foundation of Chinese Contemporary Ecological Aesthetics

作　　者：马草[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300375

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第6期1047-1052,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJC720033)

摘　　要：生态整体主义是当今世界最有影响力的哲学思潮之一,对于人类重新认识和理解人与自然的关系有着重要的启示与借鉴意义。然而生态整体主义并非尽美尽善,而是存在着相当的疏漏,这主要体现为三个方面的困境:一是反人类中心主义的悖论,生态事实上的反人类中心主义与价值判断和责任主体上的人类中心主义形成了悖论;二是对人与自然关系的误解,仅从生物性存在的角度理解人与自然的关系,忽视了人的社会性存在才是正确理解人与自然的关系本质的关键;三是个体维度的缺失,过度强调整体的地位与作用,而忽视了个体的合法权利与重要性。As one of the world＇s most influential philosophical thought, ecological holism has important enlightenment and reference significance in understanding the relationship between man and nature. However, ecological holism has not reached the degree of perfection because of some omissions. This is mainly reflected in three aspects of the predicament： First, the anti-anthropocentric paradox, ecologically factual anti-anthropocentrism and the value judgment and the subject of liability on the doc trine of human centre form a paradox; Second, the misunderstanding of relationship between man and nature, i.e. only from the perspective of biological existence relationship between the two while ignoring that the social nature of human existence is the correct understanding of the relationship between man and nature; Third, the lack of individual dimension, or excessive emphasis on the status and role of the whole, while ignoring the legitimate rights and the importance of the individual.

关 键 词：生态整体主义 困境 反人类中心主义 人与自然关系 个体维度 

分 类 号：B151[哲学宗教—世界哲学]