检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱伟东[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院西亚非洲研究所,北京10007 [2]中国海洋大学法政学院,山东青岛266100
出 处:《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第6期31-43,共13页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金课题"中非经贸投资纠纷解决机制研究"(13BFX158)
摘 要:随着东亚地区一体化程度的加强,中日韩三国之间的民商事案件日益增多,但三国之间的管辖权规则存在很大差异,不利于地区一体化的进一步发展。因此,三国应对国际民事案件的管辖权规则进行协调。具体而言,三国可以通过国内、双边和地区性或多边途径的方式逐步对三国间的国际民事案件管辖权规则进行协调。在这一过程中,三国国际私法学者应发挥应有的作用。Taking into account the current situation of the international civil procedure in China,Korea and Japan as well as the jurisdictional conflicts that may arise from the differences in the jurisdictional rules between the three countries,it is submitted that more attention should be paid to the coordination of the international jurisdictional rules between them to strengthen and further the regional integration that they have been pursuing.To be specific,the jurisdictional rules in the three countries may be coordinated through national,bilateral and multilateral efforts.The international private law scholars in this region should take an active part in such a meaningful and significant process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70