检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南中医学院第一临床医学院,郑州450000
出 处:《世界复合医学》2015年第4期362-365,共4页World Journal of Complex Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察调肝理脾法治疗便秘型肠易激综合征(肝气郁结证)的疗效观察。方法:选取在本院消化科门诊就诊的便秘型肠易激综合征(肝气郁结证)患者70例为研究对象。采用随机数字表达随机分为治疗组和对照组,对照组35例给予西医常规治疗,治疗组35例在对照组西药治疗基础上加用调肝理脾类中药综合治疗,比较两组临床疗效,并记录药物不良反应。结果:治疗组总有效率(97.14%),对照组总有效率(85.71%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组主要症候积分改善优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合治疗便秘型肠易激综合征优于单一西药治疗。Objective: To observe the liver principle spleen method to treat constipation type of irritable bowel syndrome(diseases with ease card) the curative effect of observation. Methods: Select digestive department in our hospital clinic on constipation type of irritable bowel syndrome(diseases with ease) patients 70 cases as the research object.Using random Numbers were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, control group given conventional western medicine treatment, 35 cases in treatment group 35 cases in the control group based on western medicine combined with the liver spleen class Chinese medicine comprehensive treatment, compared two groups of clinical curative effect, and record adverse drug reactions. Results: Treatment group total effective rate(97.14%), control group total effective rate(85.71%), two groups of comparison, the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05), the treatment group the main symptom integral improvement is better than that of control group(P 0.05). Conclusion: Combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of constipation type of irritable bowel syndrome is better than single western medicine treatment.
分 类 号:R256.35[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28