检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙正军[1]
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学历史学院
出 处:《文史哲》2016年第1期21-37,165,共17页Literature,History,and Philosophy
摘 要:史料批判研究是近年来魏晋南北朝史研究中较为流行的一种研究范式。这种研究把以往多视为客观记录的历史文字看成是融入了史家的有意识书写,注重探求历史文献的构造、性格和执笔意图。史料批判研究的兴起除得益于传统史料处理方式的进一步发展外,后现代史学的"文本"观念也起到了推波助澜的作用。而作为一种潮流的史料批判研究,吸引了一批年轻研究者从事其间,产生了大量颇具启发性的研究成果。但该研究也存在着一些不足,如推测成分较多,"破"有余而"立"不足,对历史文本的怀疑有时也会有过度之忧,这都是需要反省和警惕的。Criticism of historical materials is a kind of research paradigm,popular in recent studies of the Wei,Jin,Northern and Southern Dynasties,which mainly regards historical documents as objective records formerly integrated into the consciousness of historians,so the structure,character,and intention for writing of the historical documents are increasingly sought after.Besides benefiting from the further development of traditional handling of historical materials,the rise of such criticism is also driven by the idea of'text'proposed by post-modern historiography.As a trend,the criticism of historical materials has attracted a batch of young scholars,and has produced abundant illuminating results.But there are still some deficiencies which need our reflection and vigilance,such as overmuch speculation,breaking much more than establishing,and excessive skepticism regarding the historical texts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222