检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅学敏[1] 蔡广强[2] 刘丽君[2] 卢小艳[2] 李悦[2] 张金松[1,2]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院,518055 [2]深圳市水务(集团)有限公司,广东深圳518031
出 处:《水处理技术》2016年第1期71-74,共4页Technology of Water Treatment
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2015ZX07406-004)
摘 要:以南方某微污染水源为研究对象,分析了二氧化氯、高锰酸钾、过氧化氢、臭氧和臭氧-过氧化氢不同预氧化剂对水体中三氯乙醛生成潜能(CHFP)的影响,以找出合适的预氧化剂及其适宜的投加量,为三氯乙醛(CH)的控制提供指导。结果表明,能够有效降低CHFP的化学预氧化方式依次为高锰酸钾、过氧化氢和二氧化氯,优化投加量分别为0.4、5.0、0.5 mg/L,对CHFP相应的去除率分别为43.66%、23.86%、21.86%;臭氧和臭氧-过氧化氢能够使CHFP含量增加或对其去除作用不明显,不适用于常规工艺中CH的控制。The influences on chloral hydrate formation potential (CHFP) from different chemical pre-oxldants, chlorine dioxide (ClO2), permanganate (KMnO4), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ozone (O3) and ozone/hydrogen peroxide (O3-H2O2,) were studied for a micro-polluted water source in the south of China. Suitable pre-oxidants and corresponding optimum doses were determined to provide guidance for controlling chloral hydrate (CH) formation during drinking water treatment. The results indicated that the pre-oxidants of KMnO4, H202 and C102 could decrease CHFP effectively were, and corresponding optimum doses were 0.4, 5.0 and 0.5 mg/L respectively, and the removal rates to CHFP were 43.66%, 23.86% and 21.86% separately. In addition, 03 and O3-H2O2 were not suitable for controlling CH in the conventional treatment process because they could increase CHFP or not remove CHFP effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.67.167