检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小鸽
机构地区:[1]山东大学经济研究院
出 处:《中国经济问题》2016年第1期71-81,共11页China Economic Studies
摘 要:本文利用微观数据考察了计划生育对代际收入流动的影响,以此作为理解收入不平等现状的一个代际视角。文章从家庭规模与代际收入流动的关系入手,利用社区层面的政策规定生育数量作为家庭规模的工具变量,并利用分位数回归考察不同收入水平上家庭规模效应的异质性。研究发现:计划生育政策通过缩小家庭规模增加了社会的代际收入流动性,生育政策的差异化安排可以部分解释城乡之间、民族之间的代际收入流动差异。本文同时还发现,计划生育对代际收入流动的影响依家庭收入水平的不同而不同,计生政策确实有助于低收入家庭跳出"低收入代际流动陷阱",但也加剧了"富二代"现象的发生。From an intergenerational perspective of income inequality, we use micro data to examine the impacts of family planning policy (FPP) on intergenerational income mobility (IGM). For analyzing the impact of family size on IGM, we took numbers of children allowed by policy on community-level as an instrumental variable for family size, and fitted a quantile re- gression model to capture the heterogeneous effects across income levels. We find that FPP increases IGM through its reducing effect on family size in China, and FPP arrangements between urban and rural areas can partially explain the differences of IGM between these two types of areas, as well as that between Han and the minorities. We also find that the impact of FPP on IGM heavily depends on family income levels, and FPP does help low-income families move out of "intergenerational mobility trap", but exacerbates "the second generation of riches still remains rich" phenomenon.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7