机构地区:[1]大连市友谊医院肾内科,辽宁116001 [2]辽宁出入境检验检疫局卫生检疫监管处 [3]辽宁国际旅行卫生保健中心
出 处:《当代医学》2016年第2期1-3,共3页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的探索NT-pro BNP在腹膜透析患者容量负荷评估中的临床应用价值。方法选取腹膜透析(PD)患者42例为研究对象,进入观察前个体化透析处方,监测受试患者的血NT-pro BNP、Alb、Hb、Ca^(2+)、P^(3+)、PTH、SBP、DBP、Kt/V、LVDd、LVPWT、LVST、EF、CTR等,分析NT-pro BNP与各项指标的相关性。结果腹透患者NT-pro BNP水平[心衰组与非心衰组分别为(15171.30±14185.87),(2837.04±2167.14)较对照组(141.25±87.20)明显升高(P<0.05)];患者血压与NT-pro BNP水平呈显著正相关(SBP:r=0.468,P<0.05;DBP:r=0.509,P<0.05);NT-pro BNP水平与ALB、HB呈负相关(r=-0.206、-0.311),与CHOL呈正相关(r=0.34);心衰组(1.39±0.26)与非心衰组(1.73±0.15)腹透患者KT/V与血NT-pro BNP水平呈正相关(r=0.270);CTR在腹透患者中升高,与NT-pro BNP呈正相关(r=0.557,P<0.01);LVDd在心衰组与非心衰组有增高[女性心衰组与非心衰组分别为(60.83±5.85)、(47.17±5.49),与对照组(43.33±5.65)相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);男性心衰组与非心衰组分别为(66.17±6.94)、(52.67±2.58),与对照组(50.67±2.88)相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)];心衰组EF明显下降(P=0.009);LVPWT、LVST在腹透患者之间比较差异无统计学意义,但与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.080、0.054)。血NT-pro BNP水平与LVDd(女性r=0.398,男性r=0.784,P<0.01),LVPWT(r=0.456,P<0.05),LVST(r=0.442,P<0.05)均呈正相关,与EF呈负相关(r=-0.363)。结论腹膜透析患者血NT-pro BNP水平明显升高,升高的程度与心功能分级有关,可作为评估腹膜透析患者心功能及容量负荷的指标。Objective To explore the clinical value of NT-proBNP in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in the assessment of the volume load. Methods Forty-two peritoneal dialysis patients were chosen for the study, individual dialysis prescription was made before they entered the observation, the patient's blood tested NT-proBNP, Alb, Hb, Ca2+, P 3+, PTH, SBP, DBP, Kt/V, LVDd, LVPWT, LVST, EF, CTR, etc. were monitored, and the correlation of NT-proBNP and indexes above mentioned were analyzed. Results NT-proBNP levels(heart failure group and non-heart-falure group were 15171.30±14185.87, 2837.04±2167.14 separately) in PD patients were markedly elevated compared with control group (141.25±87.20) (P〈0.05), patients' blood pressure were significantly positively correlated with NT-proBNP levels (SBP: r=0.468, P〈0.05; DBP: r=0.509,P〈0.05); NT-proBNP level was negatively correlated with ALB and HB separately (r=-0.206, -0.311), and positively correlated with CHol (r=0.34); KT/V in heart-failure (HF) group (1.39±0.26) and non-HF group (1.73±0.15) was significantly positively correlated with NT-proBNP level (r=0.270); CTR was increased in PD patients, and was significantly positively correlated with NT-proBNP (r=0.557, P〈0.01); LVDd in HF group and non-HF group were increased (Female: HF group and non-HF group were (60.83±5.85), (47.17±5.49) separately, control group was (43.33±5.65) (P〈0.05); Male: HF group and non-HF group were (66.17±6.94), (52.67±2.58) separately, control group was (50.67±2.88) (P〈0.05); EF in HF group was significantly decreased (P=0.009); LVPWT, LVST have no difference between the PD patients, but were significantly different when compared with control group (P= 0.080, 0.054). NT-proBNP blood level was positively correlated with LVDd (Female: r=0.398; Male: r=0.784, P〈0.01), LVPWT (r=0.456, P〈0.05), LVST (r=0.442,P〈0.05), and was negatively correlated with EF. Co
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...