《遗山文集》与金朝党狱研究  

A Study of Relation of Collected Works of Yishan(遗山文集)and the Party's Case in Jin Dynasty

作　　者：王峤[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《史学集刊》2016年第1期105-111,共7页Collected Papers of History Studies

摘　　要：元好问《遗山文集》中的碑志文涉及金朝的三次党狱,其中关于田瑴党狱的细节,当时人对田瑴党狱发生原因的看法,贞祐党狱发生的原因、细节和涉案人员的记载,可补《金史》记载之不足,将其与相关史料进行比较研究,可厘清皇统党狱和贞祐党狱的前因后果。然元好问出于对赵秉文的私人感情,对明昌党狱仅是简略涉及。金朝三次党狱的对象都是汉官,这不仅使金朝政府失去了数位学识渊博的优秀人才,更重要的是延缓甚至丧失了部分汉族文人对金政权的认同。Yuan haowen（元好问） described three party＇s cases in his Collected Works of Yishan（遗山文集）. He described the details of Tianjue（田瑴） Case in Huangtong（皇统） period,people＇s view at that time on the reason of this case,recorded the cause,details and persons involved in the Case of Wanyan Zhenyo（完颜守贞） during Mingchang（明昌） period,which is the supplement to the lack of historical records in History of Liao Dynasty and thus can be helpful for clarifying the cause and effect of the above two cases. However,Yuan haowen described the Case of Wanyan Zhenyo very briefly in his works because of his emotion towards Zhao Bingwen（赵秉文）. The object of the three party＇s cases are all Han officials,which resulted in the losing of many erudite talents for the Jin government,what＇s more important,these cases damaged the government＇s credibility,and many Han nationality scholars gave up their identity with Jin government.

关 键 词：《遗山文集》 金朝 党狱 汉族文人 

分 类 号：K246.4[历史地理—历史学]