危险驾驶行为量表的修订及信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of Dangerous Driving Behavior Scale

作　　者：王健霖 常若松[1] 孙龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029

出　　处：《人类工效学》2015年第6期47-49,16,共4页Chinese Journal of Ergonomics

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学基金资助(L14BSZ050)

摘　　要：目的 修订驾驶员危险驾驶行为量表（包括分量表1危险驾驶行为自我报告量表和分量表2危险驾驶行为自我评估量表）,并且检验该量表在我国驾驶员这一群体中的信度和效度。方法 使用危险驾驶行为量表和大五人格量表,对驾驶员进行测试后一共获得281份有效问卷,通过分析之后得到量表的最终修订版。结果 危险驾驶行为共28个题目,累计贡献率为71.11%;该量表的模型拟合度较好（GFI=0.96,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,RFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.046）。两个分量表的内部一致性系数为0.89,且P〈0.01;两个分量表各自内部题目相关系数在0.51~0.80之间,且P〈0.01。结论 修订版的危险驾驶行为量表信效度良好,能够作为检测驾驶员危险驾驶行为的有效工具。Objective To revise the Dangerous Driving Behavior Scale（DDBS） and test its reliability and validity among Chinese drivers. Methods 281 drivers took the test. A final Chinese version of DDBS was got after data analysis, exploratory factor analysis（EFA） and confirmatory factor analysis（CFA）. Results DDBS consisted of 28 items, which was divided into 2 scales. The factors＇ratio of cumulative contribution was 71.11% The indicators of confirmatory factor analysis met the requirements of psychometric（ GFI = 0.96, NFI = 0.90, CFI = 0. 92, RFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.046）. The Cronbach＇s of the whole inventory was 0.89. Pearson correlations between the scales and the whole in- ventory were from 0. 51 to 0.80, all Ps 〈 0.001. Conclusion DDBS can be used as an effective and reliable tool for evaluating dangerous driving behavior.

关 键 词：驾驶员 驾驶行为 危险行为 信度 效度 事故预防 交通安全 

分 类 号：B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] U471.3[哲学宗教—心理学]