检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周勇辉[1,2] 刘玉萍[1,2] 拉本[1,2] 李兆孟 苏旭[1,2] 马永贵
机构地区:[1]青海师范大学生命与地理科学学院,青海省自然地理与环境过程重点实验室,西宁810008 [2]青海师范大学青藏高原环境与资源教育部重点实验室,西宁810008 [3]青海省青藏高原药用动植物资源重点实验室,西宁810008
出 处:《植物研究》2016年第1期26-33,共8页Bulletin of Botanical Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31260052);青海省自然科学基金项目(2014-ZJ-947Q);中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学国家重点实验室项目(LSE2012-01);青海省高原作物种质资源创新与利用国家重点实验室培育基地开放课题项目(2013-01);青海省青藏高原药用动植物资源重点实验室(2814-Z-Y25)资助
摘 要:通过扇穗茅属两个物种40个代表居群馆藏腊叶标本的查阅、观测及叶表皮微形态特征的综合研究显示:(1)扇穗茅具有短根状茎,圆锥花序,每小穗含6~8小花;寡穗茅无根状茎,总状花序,每小穗含3~6的小花。显然,两者隶属于不同的类群,是典型的种间关系;扇穗茅具有较原始的外部形态特征,而寡穗茅则有较高级的外部形态特征。(2)扇穗茅属两物种的叶表皮皆由长细胞、短细胞、气孔器细胞组成;同时,两物种在长细胞的长度与宽度,气孔器体积大小与分布及副卫细胞的形状,短细胞的丰缺与着生形式等性状上存在明显差异。(3)根据叶表皮性状的特征和演化趋势,对物种间系统位置和演化关系的分析表明,它们具有明显的种间间断,并且扇穗茅较原始,寡穗茅较进化,寡穗茅极有可能是由较低级的扇穗茅演化而来。这一系统进化关系与利用外部形态特征所获得的结论基本一致。We comprehensively studied the main character differences of 40 reprehensive populations between the nearest related Littledalea racemosa and Littledalea przevalskyi by the morphological observation and anatomical analysis of leaf epidermises. L. racemosa has short rhizomes, panicle and 6 - 8 florets per spikelet, while L. przevalskyi has no rhizomes, raceme and 3 - 6 florets per spikelet. They belong to two different species. The former is with more primitive external morphological characteristics, while the latter has more advanced ones. The leaf epidermis consists of long cells, short ceils and stomatal cells: There are also differences on the anatomical characteristics of leaf epidermises including length and wid^th of long cells, magnitude and distribution of stomatal apparatus, shape of subsidiary cells, abundance and growing form of short cells. According to the characteristics and evolutionary of trends of leaf epidermises of two species, we inferred their evolutionary positions and relationships. There is obvious discontinuity between them. Especially, L. przevalskyi is more advanced than L. racemosa, so it might derive immediately from the latter. The biosystematic relationships of these two species are corroborated by the evolutionary trend of external morphology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15