检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宁夏大学资源环境学院,宁夏银川750021 [2]商丘师范学院环境与规划学院,河南商丘476000
出 处:《商丘师范学院学报》2015年第12期77-84,100,共9页Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
摘 要:基于彭阳县样本贫困村及农户的实地调查数据,运用主成分分析法对样本贫困村的经济环境、社会环境、生态环境和政策环境4个维度的32项指标进行量化分析.研究得出:(1)各样本村的贫困综合得分差异较大,其顺序为:田壕村>关口村>太寺村>赵沟村>陡坡村>北塬村>徐塬村.致贫因素差异化明显:田壕村、关口村与赵沟村属于经济—社会—生态全面型贫困;太寺村、北塬村与徐塬村属于偏社会—生态型贫困;陡坡村属于经济—社会型贫困.(2)各样本村中有5个样本村的主成分得分在F2上均为正载荷,在F3、F4和F5上的得分达到正载荷的样本村占样本村的比例达到了57.14%,在F1上的正载荷样本村比例为42.86%.农民经济收入结构单一、农村基础设施(交通、教育、医疗、金融等)不完善、耕地供养能力弱、社会保障覆盖率低、农村信息化程度及教育水平低下等为彭阳县村域致贫的共同因素.提高耕地供养能力,实施生态移民工程,加大政府对基础设施的投资力度,优化贫困区域地理资本,完善农村社会保障体系,提高农户抵御风险能力是彭阳县扶贫工作应该考虑的重点.Based on the feild survey about Pengyang sample poor villages and households, This study used principal component analysis to quantify the samples poor villages on economic environment, social environment, ecological environment and policy environment in four dimensions, 32 indicators in total. It conclude that : ( 1 ) The composite scores of 7 sample poor villages are large variations, descending orders are:Tianhao village 〉 Guankou village 〉 Taisi Village 〉 Zhaogou Village 〉 Doupo Village 〉 Beiyuan Village 〉 Xuyuan village. The poverty factors have great difference:Tianhao village, Guankou village and Zhaogou society - ecology comprehensive poverty village ;Taisi village village ,Beiyuan village belong to the type of the economy - and Xuyuan village belong to the type of society- ecology poverty village;Doupo village belong to the economy -society poverty village. (2) The main composite scores in five sample villages have a positive load, the proportion of sample villages whose scores on F3, F4 and F5 are positive reaches to 57.1% ,in the F1 reaching to 42.86%. Farmers' economic structure is unitary, rural infrastructure (transport, education, health care, finance, etc. ) is imperfect, arable land are weak to support , poverty policies have national trend, social security coverage is low, the level of rural informatization and education are low, etc. All that was the main factors made Pengyang village poverty. Improving the ability of farmland, conducting ecological migration project, increasing government investment in infrastructure, optimizing geography capital in poverty regional, perfecting the social security system , improving the ability of farmers to resist risks are the priority when considering poverty reduction policy in Pengyang County.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.121