检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱静[1]
机构地区:[1]金陵图书馆,南京210019
出 处:《图书情报研究》2015年第4期34-37,89,共5页Library and Information Studies
基 金:2014年度江苏省文化科研课题"公共图书馆文化创新人才培养及其队伍建设研究"(项目编号:14YB14);2015年度"江苏省社科应用研究精品工程"课题"地方高校与公共图书馆共建阅读推广志愿服务机制研究"(项目编号:15SYC-094)的研究成果之一
摘 要:从传播学的视角观察和研究图书馆图书借阅的相关规律。首先分析传播学中的议程设置理论应用于阅读指导的必要性和可行性,然后以金陵图书馆图书汇文系统中2014年7--10月的图书借阅、预约数据为样本,分别统计借阅量和预约量排行榜(前10名)中"专题书架"、"主题书展"、"新书推荐"等几种"阅读议程"书目所占比例。统计结果表明两种比例均为1/3左右,说明"阅读议程"的设置对读者的阅读倾向有一定程度的影响。最后,提出几点思考:利用"议程设置"理论进一步改善读者阅读引导工作;阅读议程对图书馆员的素质提出新的要求;面向不同的群体设置不同的阅读议程。This article tries to investigate the law of book lending and book reading at li- braries from the perspective of communication science. Firstly, it analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the application of the theory of agenda setting to reading instruction. Then, tak- ing the samples of the book lending data and book reserving data from LIBSYS system at Jin- ling Library from July to October in 2014, the author calculates separately the proportions of "reading agenda" bibliography such as the "subject shelf", the "subject book exhibition", and the "recommendation of new books" in the top ten ranking list of book lending and the book reserving data. The statistical results show that both the two proportions are about one-third, indicating that reading agenda has influence on readers' reading trend to a certain degree. Fi- nally, it offers some reflections that readers' reading guidance can be further improved by adopting the theory of agenda setting, reading agenda requires new qualifications for librari- ans and different reading agendas should be set for different groups.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15