检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南通市第三人民医院急诊科,江苏南通226000
出 处:《临床荟萃》2016年第1期74-76,80,共4页Clinical Focus
摘 要:目的探讨血糖变异性对急性有机磷农药中毒(AOPP)患者预后的影响。方法选择2010年1月至2015年8月本院AOPP患者59例,按转归分为存活组(40例)和死亡组(19例),监测记录入院72小时内血糖值,比较两组平均血糖(GLUave)、血糖标准差(GLUsd)、血糖变异率(GLUcv)、血糖不稳定指数(GLI)及急性生理与慢性健康评估Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分;应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)对各指标预测死亡的价值进行评价。结果两组初始血糖及GLUave比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。死亡组GLUsd、GLUcv、GLI均高于存活组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,GLI预测预后的敏感性最高,与APACHEⅡ评分相似。结论血糖变异性与AOPP患者的预后密切相关,对实施血糖控制的AOPP患者应研究以降低血糖变异性为目标的策略以达到改善其预后。Objective To investigate the relationship between blood glucose variability and prognosis in patients with acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning(AOPP).Methods A retrospective study involving 59 patients with AOPP from January 2010 to August 2015 was performed.All cases were divided into survival group(n =40)and death group(n =19)according to the prognosis.Blood glucose(GLU),the mean and standard deviation of GLU(GLUave and GLUsd),variation of GLU(GLUcv),GLU lability index(GLI)and APACHEⅡscore were monitored and calculated.The value of prognosis of each index was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results There was no statistically difference in the GLU admission and GLUave between two groups(P 〉0.05).The levels of GLUsd,GLUcv and GLI in death group were significantly higher than those of survival group(P 〈0.05).ROC curve indicated that GLI was most sensitive in predicting prognosis and was similar to APACH Ⅱ score.Conclusion Glucose variability is firmly associated with mortality in patients with AOPP,lowering blood glucose variability is helpful in improving outcomes in AOPP patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.124.139