我国典型地区“医药分开”政策与国外“医药分业”模式的对比分析  

Contrastive Analysis on Domestic “Medical Separation” Policy in Typical Areas and Foreign “Separation of Prescribing from Dispensing” Mode

作　　者：苏澎[1] 段光锋[1] 王丽洁[1] 田文华[1] 

机构地区：[1]第二军医大学卫生事业管理教研室,上海200433

出　　处：《中国卫生经济》2016年第1期17-20,共4页Chinese Health Economics

基　　金：上海市医保协会委托项目

摘　　要：通过分析我国北京市、浙江省和福建省三明市等典型地区"医药分开"政策的主要举措和利弊情况,并对比美国、英国、瑞典等成熟"医药分业"模式和日本、韩国等新近改革"医药分业"模式的特点和改革措施,进而提出"医药分开"改革推行需谨慎、要改革药品定价机制、要推动医保支付制度改革及扩大改革范围并动员社会力量参与等建议。It analyzed the main measurement, advantages and disadvantages of the policy of ＂medical separation＂ in typical ar- eas of Beijing, Zhejiang and Sanming. It also analyzed the characteristics and reform strategies of mature ＂separation of prescribing from dispensing＂ （SPD） mode in US, UK, and Sweden and recent reformatory SPD mode in Japan and Korea. According to analysis, policy recommendations were proposed： taking cautious steps to launch reform, reforming the drug pricing mechanism, promoting health care payment system reform and encouraging social forces to participate in.

关 键 词：医药分开 医药分业 对比分析 

分 类 号：R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]