检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李良春 关继成[2] 刘仲权 鲁军[3] 高飞 牛正一
机构地区:[1]军械技术研究所 [2]军械工程学院 [3]中国人民解放军66337部队
出 处:《包装工程》2016年第1期56-60,共5页Packaging Engineering
摘 要:目的确定军品包装外包商评价指标权重。方法尝试根据军品包装外包的特殊性,建立一个包含企业绩效、生产能力、研发能力、风险、资质认证和环境条件在内的指标评价体系,用模糊层次分析法FAHP法求出军品包装外包商的评价指标权重。结果综合权重较大的4项指标分别为企业信誉、质量、质量资格认证和生产状况。其中企业信誉所占权重最大,为0.168,其次是质量,综合权重为0.096,质量资格认证和生产状况均为0.08。结论企业信誉、质量、质量资格认证和生产状况等4项指标在选择军品包装外包商时应优先考虑。The aim of this study was to determine the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers. According to the particularity of military packaging outsourcing, an evaluation index system containing enterprise performance, productivity, R & D capabilities, risks, qualification and environment was established, and the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers were calculated by FAHP. The four indicators with relatively high comprehensive weight were corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status, wherein the indicator with the largest comprehensive weight value (0.168) was corporate reputation, followed by quality with a comprehensive weight value of 0.096, and then quality certification and production conditions, both with a comprehensive weight value of 0.08. The four indicators of corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status should be given priority in the selection of military packaging outsourcers.
分 类 号:TB488[一般工业技术—包装工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147