论作为行政执行罚的“加处罚款”——基于《中华人民共和国行政强制法》  

On Additional Fine as a Pecuniary Sanction for Specific Pcerformance:Based on Normative Analysis of Administrative Compulsion Law

作　　者：胡建淼[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家行政学院法学部

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2016年第1期65-83,共19页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：《行政强制法》第12条和第45条不仅将"加处罚款"设定为行政执行罚方式之一,而且对它作了普遍性授权。但"加处罚款"在法律文本和实务操作中不易与作为行政处罚的"罚款"相区别,同时也不易与同属于间接强制执行方式的征收"滞纳金"相区分。加之在《行政处罚法》首次使用"加处罚款"之后的不少法律法规所设定的"罚款",恰恰介于作为行政处罚的"罚款"与作为行政执行罚的"加处罚款"之间,使得《行政强制法》上的"加处罚款"面临理论上的定位选择。除了定位上的问题,还有诸如"加处罚款"本身的罚款额标准,对加处的"罚款"如何征收,以及行政相对人对行政机关的"加处罚款"决定不服如何救济等问题,都值得探讨。Article 12 and 15 of Administrative Compulsion Law stipulate additional fine as one of the means of pecuniary sanction for specific pcerformanceas well as corresponding enabling rules. However, ‘additional fine＇ in legal text and law-enforcement prac tice can not be easily distinguished from ‘fine＇ stipulated in Law on Administrative Penalty and ‘ late fee＇ as a mean of indirect administrative enforcement. For the reason that ‘fine＇ stipulated in many laws and regulations after Law on Administrative Penalty are situated between ‘fine＇ as administrative penalty and ‘additional fine＇ as a pecuniary sanction for specificpcer formance,‘additional fine＇stipulated in Administrative Compulsion Law is in a theoretical plight. Except that, this ar ticle will explore other problems including standard of ‘additional fine＇, how to collect such fine, and how to challenge such decisions.

关 键 词：加处罚款 强制执行 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]