行政机关与第三人共同致害的责任分担  

Apportionment of Liability in Joint Harm Cases of Administrative Organ and the Third Party

作　　者：张亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2016年第1期76-84,174,共9页Journal of National Prosecutors College

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"基于环境风险防控视角的决策规制法律问题研究"(15CFX054)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：以公法为中心所构筑的行政法体系并不完美。在行政机关与第三人共同致害的案件中,所产生的混合责任方式在《国家赔偿法》中未予明确,但该类案件在行政实务中层出不穷;对此,法院的审判实践以及最高人民法院所创制的司法解释,实质上都隐含了对相关民法规范的准用。通过对"黄玉河案"的分析与展开,可以明晰,在处理公私主体共同致害的案件时,若无从适用国家赔偿制度的相关规范,且基于法益基础与规范基础的考量,可以准用相关民法规范,以积极实现权利救济与法制完善;在实体法上厘清责任分担的同时,仍需区别公私法之间诉讼程序差异。The administrative law system constructed around public law is not perfect. The mixed liability resulted from cases of joint harm of administrative organ and the third party is not clear in State Compensation Law,but such cases happens. Judicial practice and judicial interpretations created by the Supreme People' s Court apply relevant norms of civil law essentially when dealing with such cases.Through the analysis of Huang Yuhe vs. Tumen Forestry Office,it can be clear that,in order to actively improve the remedies of rights and legal system,the relevant civil law can be applicable mutatis mutandis basing on the legal interests and norms,when dealing with the cases of joint harm of public body and private body and judge can not apply the relevant norms of State Compensation Law; the difference between proceedings of public and private law should also be distinguished while clearing the liability in substantive law.

关 键 词：共同致害 准用 民法规范 行政赔偿 行政附带民事诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]