检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学,大连116024
出 处:《工业技术经济》2016年第1期92-97,共6页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目"加快我国传统产业向中高端升级发展的微观机制和政策创新研究"(项目编号:15ZDA025);国家社会科学基金重点项目"污染减排对产业结构调整的倒逼传导机制及政策研究"(项目编号:11AZD029);国家教育部博士点基金项目"中国污染减排政策的传导机制及有效性研究"(项目编号:20130041110040)
摘 要:本文选取1999~2011年中国30个省份的相关面板数据,首先运用DEA模型对中国环境规制的绩效进行了测算,继而运用面板回归模型实证分析了规制绩效的影响因素。研究结论表明:2000~2011年间,全国样本的环境规制绩效虽有波动,但总体呈逐年增长趋势,特别是2006年以后,增长趋势趋于稳定;就区域和省际层面而言,则表现出较大的差异性。面板回归分析的结果表明,影响环境规制绩效的因素较多,其中经济发展水平和外商直接投资成为促进环境规制绩效提高的积极因素,而环保力度和受教育水平则不利于规制绩效的提高。By employing panel data of China's 30 provinces during the period of 1999 to 2011, this paper applies DEA model, to measure the emeiency of environmental regulation. Further we use the panel data model to empirically analyze its influencing factors. The results show that during 2000 to 2011, the efficiency of China's environmental regulation manifests a gradually increasing trend with some fluctuations. Especially after 2006, this increasing trend tends to be steady. When it comes to the regional level and provincial level, there shows a large difference. The results of panel data regressive analysis indicate that there are many influencing factors which would have a significant effect on the efficiency of environmental regulation. Specifically, the economic development level and FDI are both posi- tive factors, while environmental protection intensity and education have a negative effect on the efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3