检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《情报探索》2016年第1期80-84,89,共6页Information Research
摘 要:[目的 /意义]各数据库商在知识发现功能方面都做了一些努力,但是国内学者对此研究并不多见。通过比较各数据库知识发现功能的优缺点,并调研用户满意度不高的原因,可以为其改进提供理论支持。[方法 /过程]对于数据库比较的相关文献总结归纳,其次对CNKI、万方、维普和超星四大数据库的知识发现功能进行比较并归纳总结,最后通过问卷对未使用过这些功能的原因进行调研。[结果 /结论]为开发和完善数据库的知识发现功能,满足用户需求,数据库商应合理设计数据库界面、研发与宣传并重,及时更新拓展主题词表。[Purpose/significance] Various database providers have made some efforts in knowledge discovery, but domestic scholars are rare for this study. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of knowledge discovery functions of each database and surveying the reasons why user's satisfaction is not high can provide theoretical guidance for their improvement. [Method/process] The paper summarizes relevant documents about databases comparison, then compares and summarizes knowledge discovery functions of four major databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Superstar, lastly investigates the reasons why those functions haven't been used through questionnaires. [Result/conclusion] In order to develop and improve knowledge discovery functions of databases, database providers should rationally designs database interface, focus on both R&D and propaganda, and updates and expands the thesaurus timely.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.73