检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜凡[1]
机构地区:[1]沈阳市第一人民医院骨科,辽宁沈阳110041
出 处:《中国医药指南》2016年第3期22-23,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的随着人口老龄化,颈椎病目前发病率逐渐升高,治疗方法分为手术、保守治疗,保守治疗亦有很多方法,本实验研究脊髓型、神经根型颈椎病综合治疗的疗效。方法选取脊髓型颈椎病患者146例、神经根型颈椎病患者192例,均给予药物、颈椎固定等治疗,实验组给予颈椎保护,物理治疗等治疗,以CASCS、JOA评价对照组、实验组治疗前后。结果实验组有效率分别94.79%、90.41%,对照组总有效率分别为83.33%、78.08%,两组比较综合治疗有效。结论综合治疗明显可以提高保守治疗的治愈率,改善、提高患者的生活质量,值得推广。Objective With the aging of population, the incidence of cervical spondylosis is gradually increasing, and the treatment method is divided into: operation, conservative treatment, conservative treatment also has many methods, this experiment study the effect of comprehensive treatment of spinal cord and nerve root type cervical spondylosis. Methods 192 cases of patients with cervical spondylosis, 146 cases of cervical spondylosis with nerve root type of cervical spondylosis, the treatment of drug and cervical fixation was given, and the experimental group was treated with cervical protection, physical therapy and other treatment, JOA, CASCS evaluation of the control group, the experimental group before and after treatment. Results The experimental groups were 94.79% and 90.41% respectively. The total effective rate of the control group was 83.33% and 78.08% respectively. Two groups were more comprehensive treatment. Conclusion Comprehensive treatment can improve the cure rate, improve the quality of life of patients, it is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15