检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国艺术研究院,北京100027 [2]辽宁大学图书馆,沈阳110036
出 处:《大学图书馆学报》2016年第1期103-107,共5页Journal of Academic Libraries
摘 要:周永年"儒藏说"被很多学人认为是编纂四库全书的社会舆论准备,此观点自民国郭伯恭而光大,然而却无人做深入探讨。爬梳文献,不难发现有关"儒藏说"提出的时间线索以及周永年宣传"儒藏说"的记载,基于这些材料的分析观察,"儒藏说"对四库的编纂起倡导作用的结论值得商榷,反倒可能是四库的开馆中断了"儒藏说"的进一步宣传。从时人的反应来看,"儒藏说"的社会影响被今日学界夸大了。Many people think that theory of Confucian Collection as the public opinion provision for compiling Siku Quanshu. This opinion was put forward by Guo Bogong in the Republic of China, but with no more in-depth study. It is not difficult to find the time clue when Zhou Yongnian proposed the theory and the details of his propaganda the theory based on the analysis of literature materials. The theory of Confucian Book Collection promoted the compilation of Si Ku Quan Shu is not only questionable, on the contrary, the opening of Si Ku Quan Shu may interrupt the further promotion of theory of Confucian Book Collection. The social impact of the theory of Confucian Book Collection is not as great as that was reputed by academic community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15