开放评议与双盲评议在国际科技期刊质量控制中的价值  

The value of open peer review and double-blind peer review in the quality control of international scientific journals

作　　者：常唯[1] 李自乐[1] 王成 郭宸孜 李耀彪[1] 马健[1] 王淑平[1] 张光[1] 白雨虹[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 [2]苏州生物医学工程技术研究所

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2016年第1期18-24,共7页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

基　　金：中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会"同行评议可检验规范最佳实践指南研究"项目资助(项目编号:YJH2014-02)

摘　　要：【目的】了解国际科技期刊在开放评议和双盲评议方面的实践,探索这两种评议方式的优缺点及对科技期刊质量控制的价值。【方法】对国际科技期刊实行开放评议和双盲评议的案例进行调研,如BMC系列期刊、F1000Research、Nature系列期刊等。【结果】有越来越多的期刊在尝试这两种方式,它们在减少传统单盲评议的偏见方面发挥了一定作用,但也带来了新的问题。【结论】开放评议和双盲评议适合于不同类型的期刊。期刊应根据自身的学科特点、学术定位来选择适合自己的同行评议方式,并在实践中不断评估,对之进行适当的调整。[Purposes]The paper aims to learn the practices of open peer review and double-blind peer review in international scientific journals,seek their prosandcons as well as the practice value.[Methods]This paper investigated and analyzed journals which used open peer review and double-blind peer review,such as BMC journals,F1000 Research,Nature journals.[Findings]At present,more and more journals choose one of them as their peer review model.Bias and some other issues in single-blind peer review have been overcome to some extent by the use of them,but some new problems may come.[Conclusions]Open peer review and double-blind peer review are suitable for journals with different characteristics.Journals should select proper peer review type which is suitable,and adjust it in the practice.

关 键 词：同行评议 开放评议 双盲评议 国际科技期刊 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]