北极治理法治化与中国的身份定位  

Arctic Governance under the Rule of Law and China's National Identity

作　　者：王晨光[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学法政学院,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《领导科学论坛》2016年第1期76-85,共10页The Forum of Leadership Science

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"北极治理新态势与中国应对策略研究"(15BGJ058);国家社科基金重点项目"国际法视角下的中国北极航线战略研究"(13AZD084)

摘　　要：近年来,气候变化使北极问题日益凸显并引起了国际社会的广泛关注,北极治理也逐渐"嵌入"到全球治理的范围和进程之中。在全球治理法治化的背景下,北极地区在全球、多边、双边和北极国家国内等四个层面形成了较为成熟的治理机制,并在很大程度上得到了各治理主体的重视和遵循。但在国际社会的"无政府"状态下,这些机制存在规定不明确、权威性不足、"碎片化"等缺陷,且面临着大国地缘政治博弈的冲击。随着中国参与北极治理的意愿和能力的增强,中国在北极治理法治化进程中应坚持一贯的"建设型的现状性国家"的身份定位,审时度势地扮演好参与者和建设者、遵法者和立法者、响应者和引领者等角色,努力塑造"负责任大国"的良好形象。In recent years, because of ＂state change＂ in the Arctic region, Arctic affairs has been prominent and caused wide concern increasingly, Arctic governance has been ＂embedded＂ into the scope and process of global gov- ernance as well. In the background of the global governance under the rule of law, Arctic governance regimes are ex- isted among global, multilateral, bilateral and Arctic states, and be obeyed by most governance subjects. But in the state of anarchy, there are some obstacles, such as some provisions are not clear, weak enforcement, regime fragmenta- tion, and be affected by geopolitical competition. With the increase of China＇ s will and ability to participate in Arc- tic governance, when participating in Arctic affairs, China should definite multivariate national identities-participator and constructor, law-maker and law-keeper, responder and leader according to situation, set a good image of re- sponsible power.

关 键 词：北极治理法治化 全球治理 国际机制 中国参与北极事务 国家身份 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系] D993.5[政治法律—政治学]