敦煌疑伪经四种残卷缀合研究  

Restoration and Study on the Fragments of Four Apocryphal Scriptures Among Dunhuang Documents

作　　者：张小艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心,上海200433

出　　处：《敦煌研究》2016年第1期68-77,共10页Dunhuang Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"敦煌残卷缀合研究"(14AZS001);全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目"敦煌疑伪经校录并研究"(200712)

摘　　要：敦煌文献中保存的一百多种疑伪经,绝大多数都不载于清以前的藏经,具有极高的研究价值,但其中不少都是残卷(片),给整理研究工作带来了严重的影响。本文通过内容接续、残字拼合、行款相同、字迹书风相近等角度的比较分析,将《无量大慈教经》《要行舍身经》《赞僧功德经》《佛母经》等4种疑伪经中的26号残卷(片)缀合为12组(4+4+2+2)。通过缀合,这些原本分裂的残卷得以团聚一处;而借助于缀接后的写本显示的较为完整的信息,我们又可对其形制、内容与性质作出更客观、可靠的判断。More than one hundred kinds of apocryphal scriptures kept in Dunhuang documents are of high research value, since the vast majority have not been recorded in Buddhist canons published before the Qing dy- nasty. Most of them are fragments, however, which severely impedes research work. Based on comparative anal- ysis of the incomplete characters, context continuation, formats, and calligraphic styles, twenty-six fragments of four apocryphal scriptures, namely Wuliang Dacijiao Jing, Yaoxing SheshengJing, Zanseng Gongdejing and Fomu ding, have been categorized into twelve groups. The more complete information provided by previously restored fragments allows for a more objective and reliable judgment on the form, contents, and nature of these texts.

关 键 词：无量大慈教经 要行舍身经 赞僧功德经 佛母经 残卷缀合 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]