检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛市胸科医院,山东青岛266043 [2]绍兴市人民医院//浙江大学绍兴医院 [3]绍兴市妇幼保健院,浙江绍兴312000
出 处:《现代医院》2016年第1期127-128,131,共3页Modern Hospitals
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(编号:2013KYB265);浙江省卫生经济学会资助课题;绍兴市哲学社会科学研究"十二五"规划2014年度重点课题(编号:125433);浙江省医院可持续发展华润三九研究基金项目(编号:2014ZHA-HRSJ211)
摘 要:目的比较两种付费模式的成效,为进一步优化服务流程提供试验依据。方法将497名研究对象分为实验组与对照组,对比分析两组研究对象的关键性指标。结果两组间付费复杂程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但模式改造成效实验组明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实验组模式改造成效明显高于对照组,是一种可以推广应用的付费模式。Objective To provide reference for optimizing the procedure of service to patients by comparing the effectiveness between the two payment modes. Methods 497 patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group, and key indexes from the two groups was comparatively analyzed. Result There is no statistically significant in payment complexity between the two groups( P 〈 0. 05 ). However, the effectiveness of mode transformation in the experimental group was dramatically higher than that in the control group, which has statistically significance ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The experimental group of mode transformation has a remarkably higher effectiveness than that in the control group, and thus it is worthy of promotion and application.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239