检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:佘瑞平[1]
机构地区:[1]如皋市中医院,如皋226500
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2016年第1期30-33,共4页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察改良化脓灸和传统化脓灸治疗青壮年支气管哮喘的疗效差异。方法将121例青壮年支气管哮喘患者随机分为治疗组62例和对照组59例。两组取穴相同,治疗组采用柱状艾炷、施灸处局部麻醉、灸后薄贴膏贴敷、饮食调整等多个环节改良的化脓灸治疗,对照组采用常规化脓灸治疗。每年暑期治疗1次,连续治疗3次为1个疗程。治疗1个疗程后,观察两组治疗前后发作频度评分及发作时严重程度(症状)评分情况,比较两组临床疗效。结果两组治疗后发作频度评分及发作时严重程度(症状)评分与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组治疗后发作频度评分及发作时严重程度(症状)评分与对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组总有效率和痊愈率分别为100.0%和61.3%,对照组分别为98.3%和28.8%。两组痊愈率比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后灸疮各项指标(开始化脓时间、灸疤脱落时间、排脓时间、灸疮愈合时间及灸疮最大直径)比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论改良化脓灸是一种治疗青壮年支气管哮喘的有效方法。Objective To observe the therapeutic difference between modified blistering moxibustion and traditional blistering moxibustion in treating bronchial asthma in young adults. Method Totally 121 young adults with bronchial asthma were randomized into a treatment group of 62 cases and a control group of 59 cases. With the same points selected for the two groups, the treatment group was intervened by blistering moxibustion with modification in several aspects including columnar moxa cone, topical anesthesia in moxibustion region, application of sticking after moxibustion, and regulation of diet, while the control group was by traditional blistering moxibustion. The treatment was given once every summer, successive 3 times as a treatment course. The attack frequency and intensity were scored before intervention and after a treatment course, and the clinical efficacies were compared between the two groups. Result The attack frequency and intensity scores were significantly changed after the intervention in both groups(P〈0.01). After treatment, the attack frequency and intensity scores in the treatment group were significantly different from that in the control group(P〈0.01). The total effective rate and recovery rate were respectively 100.0% and 61.3% in the treatment group, versus 98.3% and 28.8% in the control group. There was a significant difference in comparing the recovery rate between the two groups(P〈0.01); there was no significant difference in comparing the total effective rate(P〈0.05). There were significant differences in comparing the blister parameters(blister starting time, blister scar falling-off time, pus drainage time, recovery time of the blister, and the maximum diameter of the blister) between the two groups(P〈0.01,P〈0.05). Conclusion Modified blistering moxibustion is an effective method in treating bronchial asthma in young adults.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249