检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳亮[1,2] 王新安[1,2] 马爱军[1,2] 孙志宾[1,2] 倪世俊 赵艳飞[1,2] 侯仕营 翟介明 孟雪松
机构地区:[1]农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所青岛市海水鱼类种子工程与生物技术重点实验室,青岛266071 [2]青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋生物学与生物技术功能实验室,青岛266071 [3]乳山市水产技术推广站,威海261418 [4]莱州明波水产有限公司,烟台261418 [5]大连天正实业有限公司,大连116000
出 处:《渔业科学进展》2016年第1期30-35,共6页Progress in Fishery Sciences
基 金:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(20603022012005);大连金州新区科技计划项目(2012-B1-012)共同资助
摘 要:为了比较红鳍东方鲀(Takifugu rubripes)雌、雄个体的形态差异,基于主成分分析、逐步判别分析和T检验的方法,以红鳍东方鲀雌、雄群体的17个比例性状为分析对象进行研究。主成分分析构建了3个反映形态特征信息的综合性指标—主成分1、主成分2和主成分3,贡献率分别为46.776%、27.668%和7.122%,3个主成分累积的贡献率为81.566%,两个群体之间存在明显的偏离;判别分析结果显示,根据各变量对判别函数的贡献大小,筛选出两个比例性状,即体宽/体长、体周长2/体长,利用这两个性状建立起红鳍东方鲀的雌、雄判别模型,对雌、雄共72个个体的判别准确率为81.9%;T检验结果显示,体宽/体长在红鳍东方鲀两性群体间差异极显著(P<0.01),体周长2/体长在红鳍东方鲀两性群体间差异显著(P<0.05)。综合分析实验结果表明,红鳍东方鲀雄性与雌性相比,体形较宽,体周长2较长。红鳍东方鲀雌、雄的形态差异为繁育和选育过程中的性别鉴定提供了新的方法和理论依据。In this study we analyzed 17 normalized traits of Takifugu rubripes and established the discriminant equations for male and female using T-test and Multivariate Statistical Analysis methods such as Principal Component Analysis and Stepwise Discriminant Analysis. The trait values for morphological analysis were obtained by normalizing individual's morphological data to its body length. The Principal Component Analysis generated three principal components of which the contributions were 46.776%, 27.668% and 7.122% respectively, and the cumulative contribution was 81.566%. Most of the female and male individuals could be distinguished in the three-dimensional space composed of the three main components. Two normalized traits, body width/body length and body girth (2)/body length, were selected by Stepwise Discriminant Analysis based on the contribution of variables to the discriminant function. The success rate of the discriminant equations identifying 72 samples was 81.9%. As for the other 38 samples, the success rate was 84.2%. The T-test result of body width/body length between the male and female T. rubripes was highly significant (P〈0.01), and the result of body girth (2)/body length was also significant (P〈0.05). Our results demonstrated that the male individuals have wider body width and longer body girth (2) than female. By measuring only three morphological traits, body girth (2), body width, and body length, we were able to rapidly identify the gender of T. rubripes with a success rate more than 80%. In conclusion, the discriminant equations for male and female could be a simple, novel, and efficient method for sex identification during cultivation and breeding.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249