检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽大学经济学院,合肥230601
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2016年第1期55-59,F0003,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基 金:安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK11-12D32);安徽大学"211工程"青年科学研究基金(SKQN1105);2015年安徽大学国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201510357410)
摘 要:利用2001—2012年我国29省市的面板数据考察了一般贸易出口和加工贸易出口对能源强度的影响。选取加工贸易进出口额占进出口总额的比重作为指标,将29个省市划分为加工贸易发达地区、发展地区和落后地区,采用固定效应模型进行回归分析,结果表明:从整体上来说,我国加工贸易出口有利于能源消耗降低,一般贸易出口不利于能源消耗的降低。一般贸易出口和加工贸易出口对能源消耗影响存在区域差异性,印证了我国加工贸易区域内转移的必要性;加工贸易降低能源消耗强度受到人力资本、R&D投入和基础设施建设的制约。Based on the panel data of 29 provinces and cities in China from 2001 to 2012, this article studies the effects of general trade and processing trade on energy intensity. Choosing the ratio of export and import volume of processing trade to total export and import volume as an index, it divides 29 provinces and cities into developed areas, developing areas and backward areas, makes a regression analysis with fixed effect model and gets the following results. As a whole, export-oriented processing trade is beneficial to reducing energy consumption while export-oriented general trade isn' t helpful to reducing energy consumption in China. The effects of export-oriented general trade and processing trade on energy consumption are different in different areas, which proves the necessity of regional transfer of processing trade in China. The effects of processing trade on reducing energy consumption intensity are restricted by human capital, R&D input and infrastructure.
关 键 词:能源消耗强度 加工贸易 一般贸易 柯布一道格拉斯生产函数
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.242.179