检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第6期124-130,共7页Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目"财税法与社会结构和社会团结研究"(11BFX039)
摘 要:19世纪英国引入了现代所得税,国家与人民之间的财政联系更加紧密,同时也更具张力,传统上保护纳税人权利的税收法定原则有了新的发展。论文探讨了税收法定原则表述的形式,上议院财税议案审议权的衰落,以及下议院财税议案审议权面临的危机。在这种背景下,如何落实税收法定原则以充分保障纳税人的宪法权利是一项需要探索的新任务。同时也探讨了英国19世纪税收法定原则发展的经验对我国落实税收法定原则的启示。In the 19th century modem income tax was introduced in the UK, and the financial ties between the nation and its people became closer but tenser at the same time. The principle of taxation traditionally adopted to protect the rights of taxpayers had to be renewed. This paper discusses the narrative feature of the principle of taxation, the decline of the jurisdiction of the Senate Tax Bill, and the crisis faced by the jurisdiction of the Commons tax bill. In this context, how to implement the principle of taxation to fully protect the constitutional rights of the taxpayer becomes a new task. This paper also discusses in what way China's taxation system can learn from what the UK had experienced in the 19th century.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69