陶瓷作品著作权侵权认定的逻辑与规则  

Logic and Rules in Identifying the Infringement of Copyright of Ceramic Works

作　　者：黎平[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,南京210023 [2]景德镇陶瓷学院人文学院,景德镇333001

出　　处：《中国陶瓷》2016年第2期51-56,共6页China Ceramics

摘　　要：与纯艺术陶瓷作品相比,实用陶瓷艺术作品并未减损其独创性和艺术性,但却在艺术性之上增加了实用性,理应受著作权法保护。陶瓷作品著作权侵权认定包含三个层次的逻辑:一是陶瓷作品受著作权法保护,二是权利人对陶瓷作品享有著作权,三是行为人的行为对权利人的陶瓷作品著作权构成侵权。第一层和第二层逻辑实质就是陶瓷作品独创性的证成,第三层逻辑即"实质性相似+接触"。如果被控作品与权利人的作品实质性相似,同时作品权利人又有证据表明被告此前具有接触作品的条件,那么就应当由被告来证明其所使用的作品的合法来源,或者独立完成或者有合法授权,否则就要承担侵权赔偿责任。Compared with the pure art ceramic works, practical art ceramic works don＇ t detract their originality and artistry, but increase the practicability. So they should be protected by copyright law. There includes three levels of logic to identify infringement of ceramic works copyright, the first one is the ceramic works should be protected by copyright law, the second one is that the right holder has copyright for ceramics works, the third one is the actor＇ s behavior to the holder of the ceramic work constitutes infringement of copyright. The logic essence of first and second layers is the originality of ceramic works, the third layer logic is ＂substantial similarity＋contact＂ . If the alleged works and the holder＇ s works are substantial similarity, meanwhile the holder of the work could prove that the defendant had the opportunity to contact with the works, then the defendant should prove the legal sources of the works, or create independently or legal authorization, otherwise the defendant should assume compensation liability.

关 键 词：陶瓷作品著作权 侵权认定 认定逻辑 认定规则 

分 类 号：TQ174.74[化学工程—陶瓷工业] D923.41[化学工程—硅酸盐工业]