检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市100068 [2]中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,北京市100068
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2016年第1期119-121,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨协同干预对脑卒中患者自我效能及自我感受负担的影响。方法将2014年1~6月神经内科收治的92例脑卒中患者,按入院顺序分为对照组和试验组各46例,对照组采用神经内科常规护理,试验组在此基础上采用协同干预。干预前后采用慢性病自我效能量表和自我感受负担量表进行评定。结果干预前,两组患者自我效能及自我感受负担得分均无显著性差异(t〈0.585,P〉0.05)。干预后,试验组自我效能评分显著优于对照组(t=3.483,P〈0.001),自我感受负担得分显著低于对照组(t=-5.698,P〈0.001)。结论应用协同干预能有效提高脑卒中患者的自我效能,降低患者的自我感受负担。Objective To explore the effects of collaboration intervention on self-efficacy and self-perceived burden in stroke patients. Methods 92 stroke patients hospitalized in the neurology department from January to June, 2014 were divided into control group (n=46) and intervention group (n--46). The control group received routine nursing and the intervention group received collaboration intervention in addi- tion. They were assessed with Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Diseases and Self-perceived Burden Scale before and after intervention. Results There was no difference in the scores of self-efficacy and self-perceived burden between groups before intervention (t〈0.585, P〉 0.05). The score of self-efficacy was more in the intervention group than in the control group (t=3.483, P〈0.001) after intervention, and was less of self-perceived burden (t=-5.698, P〈0.001). Conclusion The collaboration intervention can improve self-efficacy and relieve self-per- ceived burden in stroke patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63