检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭飞
机构地区:[1]辽宁省本溪市第一人民医院,辽宁本溪117002
出 处:《中国医学创新》2015年第33期130-132,共3页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探讨应用MIPPO技术治疗胫骨远端骨折的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2014年5月-2015年5月来本院治疗的胫骨远端骨折患者65例,将所有患者随机分为两组,观察组33例,对照组32例,观察组用MIPPO技术进行治疗,对照组用传统切开复位内固定治疗,比较两组的骨折愈合时间、术后关节功能评分、临床疗效及不良反应情况。结果:观察组的骨折愈合时间、疼痛评分、功能评分、活动度评分、优良率及并发症发生率均优于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MIPPO技术治疗胫骨远端骨折的临床疗效明显优于传统切开复位内固定,可有效缩短愈合时间,缓解疼痛,改善功能及活动度,并发症发生率低,有更高的安全性,可在临床推广应用。Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of MIPPO treatment of distal tibial fracture. Method:65 cases of the distal tibial fractures were selected in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2015.All the patients were randomly divided into two groups,the observation group of 33 cases, the control group of 32 cases, the observation group was used MIPPO technology treatment and the control group was treated by open reduction and internal fixation with tradition.The fracture healing time, postoperative joint function score, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of two groups were compared. Result:The healing time,pain scores, functional scores,activity scores, good rate and the complications incidence of the observation group were significantly better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion: The MIPPO clinical efficacy of the distal tibial fractures is significantly better than internal fixation, which can effectively shorten the healing time, relieve pain, improve function and machine mobility, the complication rate is lower, the security is higher, it can be in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71