刑法报应主义之正当性研究  

The Justification of the Doctrine of Retribution

作　　者：陈凌剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2016年第1期32-36,共5页Journal of Baoding University

摘　　要：现代刑罚目的理论不能够脱离报应主义,而特殊预防对于报应主义的批评源自于其对现代刑法中报应主义的歪曲理解。面对预防主义的质疑,报应主义应当为其自身合理性进行说明。报应主义已经完全脱离了等害报应的原始形态,而现代刑法中的报应主义实际上以更隐蔽的形式存在于立法、司法与刑罚执行的过程中,因此,分阶段的综合理论是最符合现代刑罚目的理论。The theory of the purpose of modem penalty is not able to get rid of the retribution doctrine, while the distortion of the retribution in the modem criminal law is misunderstood by the criticism of the special prevention. In the face of the question of the prevention, the retribution should be explained by the rationality of its own. Retribution has been completely out of the original form of retribution, the distortion of the retribution in the modem criminal law exist in more subtle forms exist in the process of legislative, judicial and penal execution. Therefore, the comprehensive theory of the stage is the most consistent with the modem theory of the purpose of penalty.

关 键 词：报应主义 特殊预防主义 等害报应 等价报应 刑罚目的 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]