检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]开封市中心医院,河南开封475000 [2]洛阳市中心医院,河南洛阳471000
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2016年第1期96-97,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
摘 要:目的探讨CT和MRI对强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变的诊断价值。方法对80例强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变患者均采用螺旋CT和MRI影像检测诊断,比较两种诊断的影像表现和诊断结果。结果CT影像Ⅰ级诊断率为27.5%,显著低于MRI影像Ⅰ级诊断率(42.5%),差异有显著性(χ2=3.96,P〈0.05);影像0、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ级诊断率与MRI诊断结果比较差异均无显著性(P〉0.05)。结论CT和MRI均为强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变的有效诊断方法,二者各有其特点和不足,但MRI更适合早期诊断。Objective To explore CT and MRI diagnostic value for sacroiliac joint lesions in ankylosing spondylitis (SJLAS). Methods Eighty SJLAS patients were all diagnosed using spiral CT and MRI, ima- ging manifestations and diagnostic results compared between 2 examinations. Results Class Ⅰ CT diagno- sis rate was 27.5% and significantly lower than MRI (42.5%) (χ2 =3.96,P〈0.05) ; there were no signif- icant differences in class 0, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ diagnosis rate between CT and MRI (P〉0.05). Conclusion Both CT and MRI are effective diagnosis methods for SJLAS and have characteristics and insufficiencies, but MRI is more suitable for early diagnosis.
关 键 词:强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变 CT MRI 影像诊断
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145