检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李敏[1]
出 处:《武警学院学报》2016年第1期35-40,共6页Journal of the Armed Police Academy
基 金:武警学院青年教师科研计划课题"公安现役部队遂行反恐任务法律问题研究"(QNJS201407)阶段性成果
摘 要:国防行政与军事行政二元理论为当前某些学者所秉持。将国防行政与军事行政看作性质截然不同的两种行政现象,认为其相互独立,自成体系,没有包容关系是该理论的基本观点。然而,这一理论建构的基础是有缺陷的。作为该理论立论基础的国防与行政的关系、军事权的宪法地位以及我国国防领导体制等相关理论问题因其自身的逻辑缺失而无法为该理论提供令人信服的法理支持。立足于国防行政与军事行政二元理论基础的解构与批判成为必要和可能。Some of the current scholars insist on the dualism of the national defense administration and the military administration. The basic ideas of the theory are: the national defense administration and the military administration are two administrative ways entirely different in nature and they are independently self - contained with no - inclu- ding relationship. However the foundation of this theory is flawed. The related theories including the relation between defense and administration, the constitutional status of military power and China' s leadership system of defense which are theoretical basis of this theory and which cannot provide the compelling legal support because of their lack of the logic. It is necessary and possible to deconstruet and criticize the dualism of the national defense administra- tion and the military administration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3