比附援引法律制度的历史考察:对于重构我国现代类推制度的启示  

The Historical Review to the Institution of Analogy:Inspiration to Rebuilding Analogy in Modern Times of China

作　　者：白雪峰[1] 陈加奎 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院研究生院,北京102488 [2]浙江省苍南县人民检察院,浙江温州325800

出　　处：《河北法学》2016年第2期189-200,共12页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：比附援引制度用于应对刑律没有明文规定某一行为如何定罪量刑,但是刑事司法实践中又需要对此行为施以相应的刑罚而设置。此制度为中华法系一大特色,从隋朝正式建立到清末沈家本等人参酌西律力主罪行法定原则而废除,期间有一千三百多年的历史。通过历史的研究方法对比附援引制度进行梳理和史料挖掘,发现其随着民族法律文化融合而进化,且法律解释的必要性、弥补法律漏洞的可行性以及处罚违背"正当理性"的潜在性为其存在的法理基础。那么在当下受西方法治文明影响的社会背景下,按照比附援引制度的进化理路,同时立足其法理基础,对于重构我国现代类推制度是有所裨益的。The institution of analogy in criminal law is to cope be punished in judicial practices, but the statutes them to fit these crimes. It acts as one of the with the law cases have not enacted characteristics in which ought to how to punish Chinese legalgenealogy, has a long history of more than 1300 years from Sui dynasty which formally enacted in statutes to the end of Qing dynasty , the Chinese famous jurists such as Shen Jiaben who use the doctrine of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime for reference, and from then on , this institution was abolished. Based on historical review to the institution of analogy and historical data mining by historic research method. It can be find that the evolution of this institution result from the fusion of national legal culture. The legal basis of this institution can be summarized to this：necessity of interpretation of law, feasibility of making up for the loopholes in the law, and had a potentiality to punish someone who infringe the law called ＂right reason＂. Thereby under the social background which influenced by western legal civilization, according to its evolutionary paths and based on its legal basis. It is beneficial to reconstructing the modern analogy system in our country

关 键 词：比附援引 断罪无正条 法律解释 法律漏洞 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]