检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王志娟[1] 郭川川[1] 宋远明[1] 王波[1] 徐恵忠
机构地区:[1]烟台大学环境与材料工程学院,山东烟台264005
出 处:《硅酸盐学报》2016年第2期292-298,共7页Journal of The Chinese Ceramic Society
基 金:国家自然科学基金(No.51272222)资助项目
摘 要:采用化学方法合成出纯的碳硫硅钙石和钙矾石,对比研究了二者的稳定性。结果显示:钙矾石比碳硫硅钙石更易受到碳酸钠破坏;碳硫硅钙石与氯化钡几乎不发生反应,钙矾石则较易被氯化钡破坏;在碳化条件下,钙矾石较易分解,碳硫硅钙石则几乎没变化。碳硫硅钙石在碳酸钠或氯化钡溶液中的稳定性、热分解稳定性和碳化稳定性均明显高于钙矾石,可能是由于碳硫硅钙石结构中离子键和氢键强度高于钙矾石。Pure thaumasite and ettringite were synthesized by a chemical method, and their stability was investigated. The results show that ettringite is more easily destroyed by sodium carbonate than thaumasite. Thaumasite can hardly react with barium chloride, while ettringite can be absolutely destroyed by barium chloride. Ettringite is more easily decomposed under carbonation condition, compared to thaumasite. The stability of thaumasite, i.e., damaging effects of chemical substances, thermal decomposition and carbonation, is superior to that of ettringite. This may be attributed to the stronger ionic bond and hydrogen bond of thaumasite, compared to those of ettringite.
分 类 号:TU528.2[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.250.4