检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚红涛[1] 贾敏[1] 陈克永[1] 徐丽娟[1] 栗林[1] 刘亚庆[1]
出 处:《中国循证心血管医学杂志》2016年第1期88-90,共3页Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨En Site-Velocity指导下导管射频消融(RFCA)治疗阵发性室上性心动过(PSVT)的有效性及安全性。方法 60例PSVT患者随机分组为X线导航组及En Site Velocity导航组各30例,分别进行电生理检查及RFCA治疗,对两组的手术时间、X线曝光时间、X射线量、成功率及并发症发生情况进行比较分析。结果与X线导航组相比,En Site Velocity导航组的患者在手术时间、X线曝光时间、X射线量时间显著降低(P<0.01)。两组手术即刻成功率、随访3个月后复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 En Site Velocity导航RFCA治疗PSVT是安全有效的,而且可减少X线透视时间。Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of En Site Velocity guided radiofrequency catheter ablation(RFCA) in treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia(PSVT). Methods PSVT patients(n=60) were randomly divided into X-ray guided RFCA group(X-ray group) and En Site Velocity guided RFCA group(En Site Velocity group, each n=30), and all given electrophysiological examination and RFCA treatment. The duration of RFCA, X-ray exposure time, X-ray quantity, success rate of RFCA and complication incidence were compared and analyzed in 2 groups. Results Compared with X-ray group, the duration of RFCA, X-ray exposure time and X-ray quantity decreased significantly in En Site Velocity group(P〈0.01). The difference in immediate success rate of RFCA and recurrent rate after 3-month follow-up had no statistical significance(P〉0.05). Conclusion En Site Velocity guided RFCA is safe and effective and can reduce X-ray exposure time in treatment of PSVT.
关 键 词:阵发性室上性心动过速 导管射频消融 ENSITE VELOCITY
分 类 号:R541.71[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244