危险行为态度量表在驾驶员群体中的信效度检验  

Scale of Risk Behavior Attitude and Its Reliability and Validity among Chinese Drivers

作　　者：常若松[1] 马文瑶[1] 孙龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2016年第1期84-86,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘　　要：目的：检验修订版危险行为态度量表在我国驾驶员测量中的信、效度和适用性。方法：采用中文版危险行为态度量表对驾驶员进行测试,获得480份有效问卷,通过项目分析,探索性因素分析与验证性因素分析,形成最终修订量表。结果：量表包括18个题目,分为3个维度,累计方差解释率为54.96%;量表的模型拟合度较好（CFI=0.96,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,RFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.045）。量表各因素与总分相关在0.50-0.71之间,P均〈0.01.量表总的内部一致性系数为0.81,各个因素的内部一致性系数在0.70-0.87之间;量表各维度与驾驶行为量表各维度之间相关显著,表明量表具有良好的相容效度。结论：修订版危险行为态度量表具有良好的信效度,是测量危险行为态度的一个可靠而有效的工具。Objective：To test the reliability and validity of the revised Scale of Risk Behavior Attitude（SRBA）among Chinese drivers.Methods：480drivers took the test and after item analysis,exploratory factors analysis（EFA）and confirmatory factor analysis（CFA）,we got the final revised scale.Results：The scale contained 18 items,which were divided into 3 dimensions,explaining 54.96% of the total variance;CFA found that the model was good（CFI=0.96,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,RFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.045）.The correlation between each dimensions and the total scale were from 0.50 to 0.71.The Cranbach＇sαof the thtal scale were 0.81,factors were 0.70-0.87 for each dimensions.The correlations between SRBA and Driver Behavior Questionnaire verified the validity of the SRBA.Conclusion：The revised version of SRBA has good reliability and validity;It can be a reliable and effective tool for assessing driving behavior attitude.

关 键 词：驾驶员 危险行为 态度 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]