吕思勉、钱穆治史观念与风格异同之比较——以“西汉政制”及相关问题为例  

The Comparison Between Lü Simian and Qian Mu in Concepts and Styles on History Research——Taking Political System of Western-Han Dynasty and Related Problems as the Examples

作　　者：张耕华[1] 朱伟明[2] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系 [2]华东师范大学外语学院法语系

出　　处：《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第1期115-124,191,共10页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：2012年度国家社科项目"吕思勉史学研究"(12BZS003)

摘　　要：比较吕思勉、钱穆这两位史学大家有关西汉政制的评述,可见两人治史观念与风格上的差异:钱氏以提取历史精神为首务,吕氏以叙述史事实态为宗旨;钱氏坚守以本土经验解释本土材料,吕氏尝试以域外新学分析本土的旧典。钱氏是上层之"士",具有强烈的领导社会的使命感;吕氏是下层之"士",怀抱热切的推动社会进步的责任心。两人治史所取的立场不同,解释的方法、理论也不同。于是,"汉代政制"便在他俩的史著中呈现出不同的历史形象。Comparing the comments of two historians,Lü Simian and Qian Mu,on political system of the Western-Han Dynasty,we could find the differences of their concepts and styles on history research: Qian Mu mainly wanted to extract the spirit of history,and Lü Simian narrated real historical events primarily; besides,Qian Mu adhered to explain local materials by local experience,Lü Simian attempted to analyses local ancient documents by foreign new learning. Qian Mu was upper class scholar who had the strong sense of mission to lead society. Lü Simian was under class scholar who had the great sense of responsibility to promote social progress. There were many differences in their researching position,interpretation method and theory,so political system of Western-Han Dynasty was shown in different historical images in their historical works.

关 键 词：吕思勉 钱穆 西汉政制 治史观念与风格 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]