检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学训练部
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2016年第2期227-230,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:"中华医学会医学教育分会"2012年度医学教育研究立项课题.医学生学习风格现状与对策研究.(编号:2012-FF-1);2013年度学校青年启动基金课题.我校学员学习风格优化对策研究.(编号:2013QN01);2015年度上海市高等教育学会重点资助课题<基于不同维度的医学生优势学习风格实证分析>(编号:ZDGJ01-15)
摘 要:目的:分析Kolb学习风格量表与VARK学习风格量表测试结果之间的关系,以期为探究学习风格影响因素之间的关系提供依据。方法:应用Kolb3.1版本和VARK7.0版本,调查某军医大学所有在校学员的学习风格。结果:Kolb学习风格类型与VARK学习风格分布情况的比较有统计学意义(χ^2=41.782,P=0.000);与VARK学习风格倾向重数的比较有统计学意义(χ^2=26.525,P=0.002);而与VARK学习风格强度的比较没有统计学意义(χ^2=12.517,P=0.186)。结论:Kolb学习风格与VARK学习风格测量结果有一定相关性;由此推断学习风格的生理要素和心理要素可能也有一定的相关性。Objective:To analyze the relationships between Kolb learning style 1 ypes and VARK learning style types of Military University Undergraduates,to put basis for probing into the relationships among the influencing factors on learning styles.Methods:Using Kolb questionnaire(3.1 version)and the Visual,Aural,Read/Write,Kinesthetic questionnaire(7.0 version),we surveyed all undergraduates on campus of a military university.Results:There were statistical significances(χ^2=41,782,P〈0.001) between types of Kolb learning style and distributions of VARK learning style of the undergraduates.There were also statistical significances(χ^2 = 26.525,P〈0.01)between types of Kolb learning style and the quantity of VARK learning style orientations,while there were no statistical significances between types of Kolb learning style and intensities of VARK learning style(P〉0.05).Conclusion:There are relationships between Kolb learning style Types and VARK learning style types in test results.It is inferred that there are maybe some relationship between physiological and ecological factors of learning styles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.205