检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅玉仙[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江省衢州市常山县人民医院,浙江衢州324200
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2016年第1期36-38,共3页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
摘 要:目的研究医院手术室内镜器械的清洗消毒方法及其清洗消毒效果。方法采用细菌定量培养方法,对某医院使用后的内镜器械不同清洗消毒方法的效果进行比较观察。结果传统清洗消毒方法的对照组消化内镜清洗消毒效果合格率为90.2%;观察组内镜清洗工艺中加入了酶洗环节,清洗消毒效果合格率为98.2%。传统清洗消毒方法的对照组无菌内镜附件灭菌效果合格率为92.1%;观察组清洗消毒方法清洗的无菌内镜附件灭菌效果合格率为97.4%。结论内镜清洗消毒在传统方法的基础上,加入酶洗环节可明显提高清洗消毒质量。Objective To study the methods for the cleaning and disinfection of endospcopic equipments in operating rooms. Methods A comparative study was made for the effects of different cleaning and disinfection methods on endoscopic equipments in a certain hospital through the method of quantitative cultivation of bacteria. Results For the control group,the qualification rate for the traditional method of cleaning and sterilization of endoscopic equipments was 90. 2%; for the observation group,because of the adding of enzyme washing,the qualification rate was 98. 2%. For the control group,the qualification rate for the traditional method of sterile endoscopic accessories disinfection was 92. 1%. For the observation group,the qualification rate for the method of cleaning and sterilization of sterile endoscopic accessories sterilization was 97.4%. Conclusion The disinfection effect of traditional method of cleaning and disinfection can be significantly improved through the adding of enzyme washing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117