检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何立环[1] 万建红[1] 赵业芳[1] 周涛[1] 周庆玲[1]
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2016年第3期6-8,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(编号:2011-216)
摘 要:目的:探讨院外延续护患互动宣教模式对2型糖尿病足中高危患者自我管理及疾病控制的影响。方法:将60例2型糖尿病足中高危患者随机分为对照组和干预组各30例,对照组采取常规出院随访,干预组给予院外延续护患互动宣教模式。比较两组住院和出院2年后自我管理能力、血糖值及糖尿病足患病率。结果:干预组干预前后总体行为、用药管理、足部护理等比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与对照组干预后有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:院外延续护患互动宣教对2型糖尿病足中高危患者自我管理有效,值得推广应用。Objective: To discuss the influence of continuous interaction outside hospital with the high risk patients with diabetic foot due to type 2 diabetes mellitus on self-management and disease control of the patients. Methods: 60 high risk patients with diabetic foot due to type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group( 30 cases in each group). The conventional follow-up after discharge was conducted in the control group and the continuous interaction outside hospital with the patients was implemented in the intervention group. The self-management ability,blood glucose level and the prevalence of diabetic foot were compared between the two groups during hospitalization and after discharge for 2 years. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the comparison of the self-management ability and the overall behavior of the patients,medication management and awareness of the knowledge about diabetic foot between the two groups after the intervention( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: The continuous interaction with the discharged high risk patients with diabetic foot is effective in the self-management and disease control of the patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28