104例良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者手法复位治疗  

104 Patients with BPP Manual Reduction Treatment

作　　者：吕艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]赤峰市医院耳鼻喉科,内蒙古赤峰024000

出　　处：《内蒙古医学杂志》2015年第11期1321-1322,共2页Inner Mongolia Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的观察良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者采取手法复位治疗的临床疗效。方法选取我院收诊的BPPV患者104例,采取手法治疗后,观察短期临床疗效及长期临床疗效。结果本组104例BPPV患者,混合型患者2例,均为同时性双侧后半规管患者;单侧后半规管患者96例,单侧水平半规管患者6例;继发性BPPV患者23例中,发病原因:手术患者1例,感染患者1例,高血压患者11例,耳部疾病患者1例,头部外伤患者9例。单侧后半规管患者治疗1年的痊愈率优于首次治疗后痊愈率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。BPPV患者治疗1年后痊愈率优于首次治疗后痊愈率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论绝大部分BPPV患者采取手法复位治疗的临床疗效显著,且治疗方法简单,见效快,是治疗BPPV的首选方法。Objective To observe the BPP （BPPV） the clinical curative effect of patients treated with manual reduction. Methods Select our hospital diagnosis of BPPV patient 104 examples, take practices after treatment, to observe the short - term clinical curative effect and long - term clinical curative effect. Results 104 patients with BPPV, 2 patients with mixed type, are for patients with simultaneous double lientang semicircular canal; 96 patients with unilateral posterior semicircular canal, 6 patients with unilateral horizontal semicircular canal; Secondary in 23 patients with BPPV, causes： 1 patients with surgery, infection in 1 case, 11 patients with high blood pressure, ear disease in 1 case, 9 cases of patients with head injury. Patients with unilateral posterior semicircular canal treatment 1 year of recovery rate is better than the first recovery rate after treatment, the dif- ference was statistically significant（P 〈 0.05）. BPPV I year after treatment in patients with recovery rate is bet- ter than the first recovery rate after treatment, the difference was statistically significant（P〈 0.05）. Conclusion The vast majority of patients with BPPV adopt manual reduction treatment of clinical curative effect is dis- tinct, and the treatment method is simnle, effective quickly, is the preferred method for the treatment of BP-PV.

关 键 词：良性阵发性位置性眩晕 手法复位 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R764.3[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]