检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘征[1] 王海燕[2] 邹文静[2] 仝肖文 安洋[2] 李求实[2] 李艳凤[2]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040 [2]黑龙江中医药大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《针灸临床杂志》2015年第12期17-19,共3页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:国家中医药管理局龙江医学流派传承工作室建设项目;编号:LPGZS2012-14;黑龙江中医药大学"优秀创新人才支持计划"(2012年)
摘 要:目的:观察三维五法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床效果。方法:将60例患者随机分为治疗组30例和对照组30例,治疗组采用三维五法进行治疗,对照组则给予单一的针刺为主,分别治疗两个疗程后观察其疗效,并对两组患者在治疗前后的临床效果进行判断对比。结果:治疗组和对照组各治愈17例和11例,显效8例和8例,有效4例和6例,无效1例和5例,总有效率96.67%和83.30%。两组总有效率比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:三维五法治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效优于单一针灸治疗。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of Sanwei Wufa treatment for cervical spondylosis with nerve root type. Methods. 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups : a treatment group and a control group,with 30 patients in each group. Treatment group was treated by Sanwei Wufa therapy, and the control group was treated by single acupuncture. They were treated for two courses respectively to determine the efficacy and to analyze the clinical efficacy of patients in two groups before and after treatment. Results: Compared with pretreatment,the total effective rate in the treatment group was 96.67%, and in the control group it was 83.30%. This trial showed there was a statistically significant difference between two groups( P 〈0.05 ). Con- clusion : Sanwei Wufa treatment for cervical spondylosis with nerve root type is superior to the signal acupuncture treatment.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229