解释论视阈中的内幕交易犯罪  

The Judicial Interpretation of the Crime of Insider Trading

作　　者：黄旭巍 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第6期46-50,共5页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：江苏省法学会青年课题"内幕交易犯罪实证研究"(SFH2014C082013)

摘　　要：非法获取内幕信息人员既包括被动型获取内幕信息的人员,也包括间接受领内幕信息的人员。内幕交易犯罪司法解释第2条的表述方式为例示,而非列举式定义。内幕信息必须是真实的,但真实性并不意味着确定性。内幕信息形成之时的二元区分并非针对不同内幕信息类型,而是针对不同人员而言。定罪数额标准应当严格执行或者适当调整。被建议者未从事内幕交易的,建议者无罪。无违法所得时,不应判处罚金刑。共犯情形的罚金刑适用,应在严格遵循部分实行全部责任的前提下,区分主从犯。The people acquiring illegal insider information include those who passively get access to the insider information or indirectly receive the insider information. The judicial interpretation of Article 2 on insider trading crime is expressed by illustrations rather than by list-styled definitions. Insider information must be true, but the truthfulness does not mean certainty. The dual distinction of insider information is not for different types of insider information but for different types of people. The convicting amount should be strictly enforced or properly adjusted. This paper suggested that the advisee be declared innocent if he were not engaged in the insider trading; the accused not be sentenced to a fine penalty if he did not get any illegal gains. When it comes to the punishment of complicity, the principal and accessorial criminals must be distinguished strictly under the premise of definite responsibilities.

关 键 词：非法获取内幕信息人员 内幕信息 情节与处罚 司法解释 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]