检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南省第一人民医院心内科,云南省昆明市650032 [2]曲靖市中医医院心内科,云南省曲靖市655000 [3]大理白族自治州人民医院,云南省大理市671000 [4]福建医科大学省立临床学院心内科福建省立医院心内三科,福建省福州市350001
出 处:《中国组织工程研究》2015年第52期8517-8521,共5页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基 金:福建省卫生厅青年科研项目(2012-2-10);福建省卫生厅面向农村推广项目(2012024)~~
摘 要:背景:药物洗脱支架置入治疗冠状动脉病变具有良好的临床效果,但不同支架的治疗效果可能存在一定差异。目的:比较不同支架置入治疗冠状动脉病变的临床效果。方法:纳入278例冠状动脉病变患者,均接受冠状动脉支架置入治疗,其中91例置入雷帕霉素洗脱支架,92例置入紫杉醇洗脱支架,95例置入裸金属支架。支架置入后随访12个月,记录死亡和心肌梗死等不良心脏事件发生情况,以及冠状动脉再狭窄发生情况及材料宿主反应。结果与结论:雷帕霉素洗脱支架组与紫杉醇洗脱支架组冠状动脉再狭窄率、急性心肌梗死发生率、冠状动脉旁路移植或再次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗率均低于裸金属支架组(P<0.05),雷帕霉素洗脱支架组与紫杉醇洗脱支架组上述指标比较差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。3组死亡率比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。3组均未发生支架移位、脱落、断裂、置入位置不良及白细胞增多和血小板减少、溶血等情况。表明两种药物洗脱支架的治疗效果相当,均优于裸金属支架。BACKGROUND: The clinical effect of drug-eluting stent implantation in treatment of coronary artery disease is good, but there may be some differences in the therapeutic effect between different stents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect of different stent implantation in treatment of coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 278 patients with coronary artery disease were enrolled and all underwent coronary artery stent implantation treatment, of which 91 patients underwent implanted rapamycin eluting stent, 92 patients underwent implanted paclitaxel eluting stent, and 95 patients underwent implanted bare metal stents. All the patients were followed up for 12 months after stents implantation. The occurrence of adverse cardiac events such as death, myocardial infarction, and the occurrence of coronary restenosis and host reaction were recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The rates of coronary artery stenosis, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting or second-time percutaneous coronary interventional therapy in the paclitaxel eluting stent and rapamycin eluting stent groups were all lower than those in the bare metal stent group(P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in the above indicators between paclitaxel eluting stent and rapamycin eluting stent groups(P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in the mortality between these three groups(P〈0.05). There was no stent shift, shedding, breakage, bad implantation position, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia and hemolysis in these three groups. These results demonstrate that the therapeutic effects of these two kinds of drug-eluting stents are all good enough, and better than those of bare metal stents.
关 键 词:药物洗脱支架 冠状血管 西罗莫司 组织工程 生物材料 材料相容性 冠状动脉支架 药物洗脱性支架 雷帕霉素洗脱支架 紫杉醇洗脱支架 裸金属支架 冠状动脉病变
分 类 号:R318[医药卫生—生物医学工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.0.35