检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭江[1]
出 处:《世界中医药》2015年第A01期119-120,共2页World Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的分析CT 和MRI 两种方法在股骨头缺血性坏死中的诊断价值.方法:38 例患者均给予CT 和MRI 检测股骨头部位,比较两种方法的疾病检出率及影像学表现.结果:(1)在缺血性股骨头坏死I 期CT 检出率显著低于MRI,两种检验方法比较在统计学上具有显著性意义(x^2=3.844,P〈0.05),结论:MRI 较CT 可以提高早期ONFH 诊断率.Objective: To explored the diagnostic value of CT and MR in ONFH. Methods: We checked 38 patients(50 hip) who had ONFH from April 2012 to January 2014 in our hospital,38 patients were performed CT and MRI detection of femoral head, CT detection rate was 94.0%(47/50), the Ⅱ period compared with Ⅲ period on the detection rate, CT and MRI detection rate there was no significant difference(x2 = 0.328, 0.148; P > 0.05). Conclusion: MRI and CT has higher detection rate in ONFH diagnosis, MRI is CT can improve the early diagnostic ONFH, MRI more clear than level of CT images, Can improve the clinical accuracy, has the value of clinical application.
分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R681[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117